Functional illiteracy is reading and writing skills that are inadequate "to
manage daily living and employment tasks that require reading skills beyond a
basic level."[1]Functional illiteracy is contrasted with illiteracy in the strict sense, meaning the
inability to read or write simple sentences in any language.
Foreigners who cannot read and write in the native language where
they live may also be considered functionally illiterate.
Functional illiteracy is imprecisely defined, with different
criteria from nation to nation, and study to study.[2] However,
a useful distinction can be made between pure
illiteracy and functional illiteracy.Purely
illiterate persons cannot
read or write in any capacity, for all practical purposes. In contrast,
functionally illiterate persons
can read and possibly write simple sentences with a limited vocabulary, but
cannot read or write well enough to deal with the everyday requirements of life
in their own society.
For example, an illiterate person may not understand the written
words cat or dog, may not recognize the letters of the
alphabet, and may be unable to write their own name. In contrast, a
functionally illiterate person may well understand these words and more, but
might be incapable of reading and comprehending job advertisements, past-due
notices, newspaper articles, banking paperwork, complex signs and posters, and
so on.
The characteristics of functional illiteracy vary from one culture
to another, as some cultures require better reading and writing skills than
others. A reading level that might be sufficient to make a farmer functionally
literate in a rural area of a developing country might qualify as functional
illiteracy in an urban area of a technologically advanced country. In languages
with regular spelling, functional illiteracy is usually defined simply as
reading too slow for practical use, inability to effectively use dictionaries
and written manuals, etc.
Links with Poverty and Crime
In developed countries, the level of functional literacy of an
individual is proportional to income level and risk of committing crime. For
example, according to the National Center for Educational Statistics in the
United States:[3]:
Over 60% of adults in the US prison system read at or below
the fourth grade level
85% of US juvenile inmates are functionally illiterate
Adult inmates who received educational services while in
prison had a 16% chance of returning to prison, as opposed to 70% for those who
received no instruction.[not in citation
given]
43% of adults at the lowest level of literacy lived below
the poverty line, as opposed to 4% of those with the highest levels of
literacy.
According to begintoread.com [4]:
Two-thirds
of students who cannot read proficiently by the fourth grade will end up in
jail or on welfare.
Three
out of four individuals who receive food
stamps read on the two lowest
levels of literacy.
16-to-19-year-old
girls at the poverty line and below with below-average reading skills are 6
times more likely to have out-of-wedlock children than their more literate
counterparts.
Prevalence
n the United States, according to Business magazine, an estimated 15 million
functionally illiterate adults held jobs at the beginning of the 21st century.
The American Council of Life
Insurers reported that 75% of the Fortune 500 companies provide some level of
remedial training for their workers. All over the U.S.A. 30 million (14% of
adults) are unable to perform simple and everyday literacy activities.[5]
The National Center for Education Statistics provides more detail. Literacy is
broken down into three parameters: prose, document, and quantitative literacy.
Each parameter has four levels: below basic, basic, intermediate, and
proficient. For prose literacy, for example, a below basic level of literacy
means that a person can look at a short piece of text to get a small piece of
uncomplicated information, while a person who is below basic in quantitative
literacy would be able to do simple addition. In the US, 14% of the adult
population is at the "below basic" level for prose literacy; 12% are
at the "below basic" level for document literacy; and 22% are at that
level for quantitative literacy. Only 13% of the population is proficient in
these three areas—able to compare viewpoints in two editorials; interpret a
table about blood pressure, age, and physical activity; or compute and compare
the cost per ounce of food items.
The UK government's Department for Education reported in 2006 that
47% of school children left school at age 16 without having achieved a basic
level in functional mathematics, and 42% fail to achieve a basic level of
functional English. Every year, 100,000 pupils leave school functionally
illiterate in the UK.[6]
The 2009 Human
Development Report used the
percentage of people lacking functional literacy skills as one of the variables
to calculate the Human Poverty
Index in developed countries.[7]
Country
|
People lacking
functional literacy skills (% aged 16–65) 1994–2003 |
Notes
|
47.0
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
18.4
|
Flanders only.
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Research findings
Literacy at Work study, published by the Northeast Institute in
2001, found that business losses attributed to basic skill deficiencies run
into billions of dollars a year due to low productivity, errors, and accidents
attributed to functional illiteracy.
Sociological research
has demonstrated that countries with lower levels of functional illiteracy
among their adult populations tend to be those with the highest levels of scientific literacy among the lower stratum of young
people nearing the end of their formal academic studies. This correspondence
suggests that a contributing factor to a society's level of civic literacy is
the capacity of schools to ensure students attain the functional literacy
required to comprehend the basic texts and documents associated with competent
citizenship.
No comments:
Post a Comment